The premise is simple: Internet Explorer 6 is antiquated, doesn’t support key web standards, and should be phased out. This isn’t about being anti-Microsoft, it’s about Microsoft’s lack of development in the browser market. With IE7/8 not available for Windows 2000, IE6 accounts for up to 20% of web usage, primarily via business users. Clients pressure designers to ‘force’ sites to work in IE6, and designers, not wanting to lose business, comply, using hacks and workarounds. This wastes time and money. Microsoft needs to fix this, designers need to unite, and we all need to move on.
In the article, ‘Calling time on IE6’, we ask designers and developers if it’s finally time to take IE6 behind the shed and shoot it. Major names in the web industry debate our mission, talking about the pros and cons behind dumping IE6. How feasible is it to shun the browser entirely? What can you do to minimise the impact IE6 has on you and your clients (and increasingly tight budgets)? And what can and should Microsoft do to help us all move the web and web standards on? Find out by reading the article, or just ‘skip to the end’ by looking to the bottom and getting involved.
<!--[if lt IE 7]> <div id="ie6Warning"> <h4>Time to upgrade your browser</h4> <p>If you're reading this, you're surfing using Internet Explorer 6, an eight-year-old browser that cannot cope with the demands of the modern internet. For the best web experience, we strongly recommend upgrading to <a href="http://www.getfirefox.com/">Firefox</a>, <a href="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</a>, <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/">Safari</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google Chrome</a>, or a more recent version of <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/downloads/ie/getitnow.mspx">Internet Explorer</a>.</p> </div> < ![endif]-->
When using fonts on websites, font should display it’s all properties & styles on all or most web browsers which runs on different platforms like Windows, Mac or Linux. Unfortunately we don’t have much fonts which supported on all web browsers & platforms. So fonts which are working on all or most web browsers are called Web Safe Fonts.
So here are list of web safe fonts which I am using in my web design projects.
font-family:"Arial", Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-family:"Georgia", serif;
font-family:"Courier New", Courier, monospace;
font-family:"Trebuchet MS", Helvetica, sans-seri;
font-family:"Lucida Console", Monaco, monospace;
font-family:"Verdana", Geneva, sans-serif;
font-family:"Times New Roman", Times, serif;
font-family:"Lucida Sans Unicode", Lucida Grande, sans-serif;
font-family:"Tahoma", Geneva, sans-serif;
This is the document I prepared sometime back to do a small workshop about Web Accessibility.
Web accessibility refers to the practice of making websites usable by people of all abilities and disabilities.
For example, when a site is coded with semantically meaningful HTML, with textual equivalents provided for images and with links named meaningfully, this helps blind users using text-to-speech software and/or text-to-Braille hardware. When text and images are large and/or enlargable, it is easier for users with poor sight to read and understand the content.
When links are underlined (or otherwise differentiated) as well as coloured, this ensures that colour blind users will be able to notice them. When clickable links and areas are large, this helps users who cannot control a mouse with precision.
When pages are coded so that users can navigate by means of the keyboard alone, or a single switch access device alone, this helps users who cannot use a mouse or even a standard keyboard.
When videos are closed captioned (subtitles) or a sign language version is available, deaf and hard of hearing users can understand video.
Make flashing effects avoid or optional.
The needs that Web accessibility aims to address include:
Disabled users use assistive technologies such as the following to enable and assist web browsing:
In 2000, an Australian blind man won a court case against the Sydney Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (SOCOG). This was the first successful case under Disability Discrimination Act 1992 because SOCOG had failed to make their official website, Sydney Olympic Games, adequately accessible to blind users.
Basic checkpoints;
Digging deeper;
If anyone need to add anything to this or if I have missed anything, please put those as a comment.